Replaced a 60-person review queue with an evaluated agent pipeline. Same regulator, half the cost-per-case.
Ship the systems
your competitors
won’t build for years.
Crown·Banning is a senior team of staff engineers, ML researchers and product leads who embed with enterprise teams to design, build and operate AI-native software — from the first architecture review to the third quarter in production.
Six disciplines, one team.
No subcontractors, no offshoring,
no juniors learning on your dollar.
Every engagement is led by a partner and staffed entirely with senior practitioners. We don’t scale by adding bodies — we scale by being the right ones.
Read our staffing modelReference architectures for retrieval, agents, evals and human-in-the-loop — written in your stack, not a deck.
Embedding pipelines, hybrid search, fine-tuned routers and eval harnesses — benchmarked against your golden set.
SLOs, observability, cost governance and graceful degradation for systems that can't go down at 3am.
Connect Salesforce, Workday, Snowflake and the long tail. Schemas you can actually reason about.
Threat modelling for AI systems, prompt-injection defence, audit trails, and evidence packages your auditors will sign.
Interfaces for non-deterministic systems — explainability, fallbacks, and the small interactions that make models feel trustworthy.
Engagements we’re allowed to talk about.
Probabilistic demand model with audit-grade lineage. We embedded for two quarters; the planning team owns it now.
Built on top of two legacy EHRs. PHI-safe retrieval, attestable citations, and an eval harness the medical board approved.
We meet you in the systems you already run.
Production deployments touching the platforms below, across 60+ engagements.
Seven steps, no surprises.
We don’t do discovery decks. The first week ships a real prototype on real data; every week after has a demo, a delta, and a decision.
Three-hour working session with your CTO and the team you'd staff. We agree on what we're not building.
A working slice on real data in your environment. Ugly, but honest. Kills bad ideas early.
A written design doc your engineers will defend. Signed by both sides before code multiplies.
Pairs of senior engineers + your team. Trunk-based, evaluated, demoed Fridays.
SLOs, on-call runbooks, evals in CI, cost guardrails, red-team. Before, not after, production.
Phased rollout with measurable success criteria, not vibes. We're on the pager.
We hand the keys back. A six-month optional retainer keeps a partner reachable, on a single Slack channel.
Built for the work the big firms
don’t actually do.
We’re a deliberately small team. Here’s where that matters and where it doesn’t.
Crown·Banning | Global SI / Big 4 | Generalist dev shop | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team composition | 100% senior staff & principal | Pyramid; 1 partner : 30 juniors | Mixed; rotating |
| Engagement size | 4–8 people, embedded | 40–200, layered | 2–6, staff aug |
| First production release | Median 11 weeks | 9–18 months | Varies |
| AI evals & safety in scope | Default, in CI | Separate workstream | Rare |
| On-call after launch | Yes, on the pager | Managed-service tier | Out of scope |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope or weekly | T&M, change orders | T&M |
| Right call when… | It has to ship and it has to be right | You need 200 hands & a paper trail | You have the design, need the hands |
Six positions we won’t negotiate on.
These aren’t values posters. They’re the reasons we’ve walked away from work.
“They were three senior engineers and a partner. They replaced a 22-person workstream from a household-name firm and shipped a system our board now references by name. The most expensive people we've hired, and the cheapest engagement we've ever run.”